![]() |
||||||
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
| name | distinctive microbiomes and metabolites linked with weight loss after gastric bypass, but not gastric banding |
| sra | srp106919 |
| sra | prjna321731 |
| datamd5 | f434993b54fae2c7f55851a727548b8c |
| mapmd5 | c7cf046f1b2d6f7f025c18927a87736b |
| Term | Score |
|---|---|
| gastric bypass | 0.333333 |
| LOWER IN gastric bypass | 0.333333 |
| LOWER IN control | 0.008929 |
| control | 0.008734 |
| united states of america | 0.006645 |
| homo sapiens | 0.005168 |
| feces | 0.004577 |
| Term | Score |
|---|---|
| gastric bypass | 0.500000 |
| LOWER IN gastric bypass | 0.500000 |
| LOWER IN control | 0.004545 |
| control | 0.004444 |
| united states of america | 0.003333 |
| homo sapiens | 0.002591 |
| feces | 0.002294 |
| Term | Score |
|---|---|
| feces | 1.000000 |
| homo sapiens | 1.000000 |
| united states of america | 1.000000 |
| gastric bypass | 0.250000 |
| LOWER IN control | 0.250000 |
| control | 0.250000 |
| LOWER IN gastric bypass | 0.250000 |
| Term | Score |
|---|---|
| feces | 1.000000 |
| homo sapiens | 1.000000 |
| united states of america | 1.000000 |
| gastric bypass | 1.000000 |
| LOWER IN control | 1.000000 |
| control | 1.000000 |
| LOWER IN gastric bypass | 1.000000 |
| Exp. ID | User ID | Description | Date | Region | Sequences | Status | Flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 215 | amnon | lower in people with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared to controls ( high in control compared to gastric bypass in feces homo sapiens united states of america ) | 2017-10-23 | v4 | 1 / 5 | approved | No |
| 215 | amnon | higher in people with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared to controls ( high in gastric bypass compared to control in feces homo sapiens united states of america ) | 2017-10-23 | v4 | 1 / 17 | approved | No |
| 215 | amnon | dominant feces, homo sapiens, united states of america | 2017-10-23 | v4 | 1 / 18 | approved | No |
| 215 | amnon | common feces, homo sapiens, united states of america | 2017-10-23 | v4 | 1 / 107 | approved | No |
Problems / suggestions? Please visit the dbBact forum